of the justices could not but confirm, notwithstanding the revocation of the opinion
which occurred at a still later date than the last of the livo.
w was
ам
I therefore think that, although the opinion utterly wrong and unfounded, amounting in fact to
rgument à specie genus, and star
starcely to that the discovery of these facts
thout importause
is not w
e ad
for the Secretary of State, in considering the question of compensation.
567 //
If Mr. Hudson's error,- or rather that of his counsel - ( Ibid. para. 7. ) on the question= of the decision of the 20th August last being, or not being, open to revision by way of Certiorari or otherwving " as in fact, as he suggests, founded upon any error of His Excellency
in the
Avas
construction and explanation
ou
that
of my opinions point, his case is stronger still ; - the right being
barred by
мого
S.
Ordinance
No. 10 of 1844. I. 7. in regard
of Certiorari, and by the
Page 570Page 571
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.